100 S Doheny Drive 503, Los Angeles, California 90048, Los Angeles, 90048 - 1 bed, 2 bath
ACTIVE$545,000
100 S Doheny Drive 503, Los Angeles, California 90048
1Bed
2Baths
719Sqft
90,114Lot
Price Vs. Estimate
Estimation data not available
Key pros and cons
Top Pros:
Prime Location & Accessibility: Located in a highly sought-after building in the heart of Los Angeles, providing excellent access to both Beverly Hills and West Hollywood.
Top Cons:
High Monthly Association Fees: The significant monthly association fee of $910.37 represents a substantial recurring cost for ownership.
Compared to the nearby listings
Price:$545.0K vs avg $1.01M ($-465,000)13%
Size:719 sqft vs avg 1,429 sqft11%
Price/sqft:$758 vs avg $76948%
More Insights
Built in 1971 (54 years old).
Condition: The property was built in 1971, making it over 50 years old. While the description mentions an 'updated bathroom' and the powder room shown in images appears recently renovated with modern fixtures, the living area features dated light fixtures. Crucially, there are no images of the kitchen, which is a significant omission and suggests it may not be a recently updated feature. The overall condition indicates an aged home with some maintenance and partial updates, but likely requires further minor updates or repairs, particularly in the kitchen, to meet current standards.
Year Built
1971
Close
-
List price
$545K
Original List price
$545K
Price/Sqft
$758
HOA
$910.37
Days on market
-
Sold On
-
MLS number
25586969
Home ConditionFair
Features
Good View: City Lights
Pool
Spa
ViewCity Lights
About this home
Welcome to this 1 bedroom, 1.5 bath condo located in one of the most sought-after buildings in the heart of Los Angeles, offering hillside views and easy access to both Beverly Hills and West Hollywood. The open floor plan with a seamless living/dining area is filled with natural light and views. The spacious ensuite bedroom has an updated bathroom and there's a hall powder room for guests. Resort-style amenities include a sparkling pool and relaxing spa, a vast sun deck with cabanas, a fitness center, a tennis court surrounded by serene pine trees, and a key-access dog park. Perfect as a starter home, this condo offers an ideal space for both relaxation and entertainment.
Condition Rating
Fair
The property was built in 1971, making it over 50 years old. While the description mentions an 'updated bathroom' and the powder room shown in images appears recently renovated with modern fixtures, the living area features dated light fixtures. Crucially, there are no images of the kitchen, which is a significant omission and suggests it may not be a recently updated feature. The overall condition indicates an aged home with some maintenance and partial updates, but likely requires further minor updates or repairs, particularly in the kitchen, to meet current standards.
Pros & Cons
Pros
Prime Location & Accessibility: Located in a highly sought-after building in the heart of Los Angeles, providing excellent access to both Beverly Hills and West Hollywood.
Extensive Resort-Style Amenities: Residents benefit from a wide array of amenities including a sparkling pool, relaxing spa, sun deck with cabanas, fitness center, tennis court, and a key-access dog park.
Desirable Views & Natural Light: The condo offers appealing hillside and city lights views, enhanced by an open floor plan that ensures abundant natural light throughout.
Updated & Functional Interior: Features an updated ensuite bathroom and a convenient hall powder room for guests, complementing the seamless open living/dining area.
Ideal Starter Home Appeal: Positioned as a perfect starter home, offering an attractive entry point into a prestigious Los Angeles neighborhood with desirable features.
Cons
High Monthly Association Fees: The significant monthly association fee of $910.37 represents a substantial recurring cost for ownership.
Compact Living Space: With 719 sqft, the unit offers relatively compact living space, which may be a limitation for buyers seeking more expansive interiors.
Building Age: Constructed in 1971, the building's age could be a factor for some buyers, potentially implying older infrastructure or differing aesthetic preferences compared to newer developments.