The property was built in 1924, making it 100 years old. The listing description heavily emphasizes the large lot size and its development potential (splitting into multiple lots or building townhouses), explicitly stating 'the property's value is based solely on the land and its potential for redevelopment.' The instruction 'Please drive by only' and the complete absence of interior photos strongly suggest the existing structure is in very poor, likely unlivable, condition with significant deferred maintenance. The low rental income ($2,000/month for a 4-bed, 2-bath in Rosemead) further supports the idea that the house itself has minimal value and is not in a desirable or well-maintained state. The exterior images show an aged structure with visible signs of disrepair and neglect. All these factors indicate the house is beyond practical repair for residential use and is considered a tear-down for redevelopment.